Back to PropertySurvey Pro

Fictional report example

Example commercial dilapidations condition report

A detailed fictional lease-end inspection showing the type of report PropertySurvey Pro can produce from a fully completed survey.

Fieldstone Building Surveys

Independent commercial building inspections

14 Example Square, Stoke-on-Trent, ST1 1AA

[email protected]

www.fieldstone-surveys.example

Commercial Dilapidations Condition Report

Client

Northbridge Estates Ltd

Freeholder

Property

Unit 7 Meridian Court, Stoke-on-Trent, ST4 8EX

Light-industrial unit with ancillary offices · EPC D (potential B)

ReferenceFBS-2026-0728
Instruction21 July 2026
Inspection28 July 2026
Report30 July 2026
Inspection purpose

Lease-end condition and remedial-cost evidence

Survey prepared by

Maya Bennett MRICS

[email protected]

Company History

Fieldstone Building Surveys is an independent practice providing commercial building inspections, schedules of condition and lease-end property advice. Reports separate observed condition from professional interpretation, identify inspection limitations and direct specialist matters to appropriately qualified advisers.

Fieldstone Building Surveys

Independent commercial building inspections

14 Example Square, Stoke-on-Trent, ST1 1AA

[email protected]

www.fieldstone-surveys.example

Legal Disclaimer

This report records a non-destructive visual inspection of the accessible areas described. It is not a structural design, measured survey, services test, valuation or legal opinion on lease liability. Concealed construction was not opened up. The client and its legal advisers must interpret repairing covenants, supersession and any formal claim; specialist testing is required where the report says “Seek Further Advice”.

Client Instructions

Record the accessible condition of Unit 7 before the stated lease end, identify material repair and reinstatement items, relate observations to recorded locations, and provide budget allowances for discussion with the client’s legal and property advisers. Review the warehouse, office pod, welfare areas, envelope, yard and visually accessible services. The signed lease, licences for alteration and full services records were not provided, so covenant liability is outside this instruction.

Executive Summary

Primary defect. Localised water staining below the north-west rooflight aligns with a split rooflight kerb seal and corrosion at the adjoining box-gutter lap. The area was damp at inspection following overnight rain; the remainder of the warehouse roof lining was dry on comparative checks.

Other repairs. The east roller-shutter bottom rail is corroded, one yard slab has a raised edge, and local office ceiling finishes below the rooflight require renewal after the envelope repair and drying period.

Services. Services were observed but not tested. No current electrical inspection record was made available; a competent electrical contractor should review the installation and records. This is a further-advice item, not an assumed repair cost.

Overall position. The unit remained operational and no immediate instability was observed in accessible areas. The rooflight/gutter repair should be prioritised to limit deterioration. Budget allowances total £5,490 excluding VAT, with electrical advice excluded from that total.

Fieldstone Building Surveys

Independent commercial building inspections

14 Example Square, Stoke-on-Trent, ST1 1AA

[email protected]

www.fieldstone-surveys.example

Scope & Definitions

Inspection extent

Ground and first-floor accommodation, warehouse floor, accessible elevations and yard were inspected. The roof covering was viewed from ground level, the first-floor window and an internal access platform supplied by the occupier. Stored goods restricted approximately 12% of the north warehouse wall. No destructive opening-up, drainage test or service isolation was undertaken.

Reporting basis

Observations distinguish visible evidence, surveyor interpretation, recommended work and matters requiring specialist advice. Cost entries are budget allowances rather than quotations. The report can support dilapidations discussions but does not determine legal liability.

Technical Definitions

Observation
A condition or feature visible within the recorded inspection limits.
Interpretation
The surveyor’s evidence-based view, subject to the stated limitations and any further investigation.
Budget allowance
An indicative figure for planning; not a tendered price or valuation of a legal claim.
Seek Further Advice
Obtain advice from an appropriately qualified person before the scope or cost of work is determined; no allowance is included until that advice is received.

Energy Performance (EPC)

Current ratingD · 58
Potential ratingB · 83
Floor area742 m²
Valid until11 Nov 2033

Property type: industrial unit with ancillary offices. Recommendation: review lighting controls and roof insulation when planned envelope work is scoped. The EPC provides energy context; it does not establish the cause or liability for any defect.

Fieldstone Building Surveys

Independent commercial building inspections

14 Example Square, Stoke-on-Trent, ST1 1AA

[email protected]

www.fieldstone-surveys.example

Description of Property

Detached light-industrial unit constructed circa 1997. Steel portal frame with insulated composite wall and roof cladding above a masonry plinth, translucent rooflights, internal box gutters and a two-storey masonry/blockwork office pod. The site includes a surfaced service yard, palisade boundary fencing and marked parking. Approximate gross internal floor area from the supplied EPC is 742 m².

External Observations

  • Split sealant and slight kerb separation at the north-west rooflight; corrosion and staining at the adjacent box-gutter lap.
  • East roller-shutter bottom rail locally corroded, with coating loss but no visible distortion of the guides.
  • One concrete yard slab edge raised by approximately 18 mm on the pedestrian route beside the loading door.
  • Wall cladding, masonry plinth and rainwater downpipes otherwise appeared generally serviceable from accessible viewpoints.

Internal Observations

  • Localised brown staining and softened ceiling tile directly below the north-west rooflight/gutter junction.
  • Comparative pinless moisture readings reduced away from the affected area; no similar staining was found at other rooflights.
  • Office, welfare and warehouse finishes were generally serviceable, with ordinary wear consistent with use.
  • A fine vertical finish crack at the office stair enclosure measured 0.5 mm and showed no associated distortion.

Services Assessment

Electrical distribution, gas-fired unit heaters, hot-water point, fire-alarm components and above-ground drainage were viewed where accessible but were not operated, isolated or tested. The occupier supplied a fire-alarm service sheet dated February 2026. No current electrical inspection report was presented. Condition, safety and statutory compliance must be confirmed from records and by appropriately qualified contractors.

Methodology

Visual inspection supported by laser distance measurements, a crack-width gauge and comparative non-invasive moisture readings. Roof areas were viewed only from the positions stated in the scope. No drone, pole-camera survey, thermal-imaging survey or laboratory analysis was undertaken.

Fieldstone Building Surveys

Independent commercial building inspections

14 Example Square, Stoke-on-Trent, ST1 1AA

[email protected]

www.fieldstone-surveys.example

Floor Plan

Warehouse · 472 m² NIANW rooflight / gutter defectEast roller shutter
Ground-floor offices · 86 m²
Welfare · 32 m²
Office stair / circulation
First-floor offices · 112 m² gross entered area
Not to scale · inspection orientation onlyNorth ↑

Diagrammatic plan · not to scale · use for inspection-location reference only

Weather & Property Orientation — North-West

Inspection date28 July 2026
ConditionsOvercast · dry
Temperature17°C
Humidity72%
WindW · 11 km/h

Approximately 6 mm of rain was recorded overnight before the inspection. The north-west roof slope and box gutter are comparatively exposed to prevailing weather. Weather data provides inspection context and does not, by itself, establish defect causation.

Fieldstone Building Surveys

Independent commercial building inspections

14 Example Square, Stoke-on-Trent, ST1 1AA

[email protected]

www.fieldstone-surveys.example

Subsoil & Drainage Details

Dataset fieldRecorded resultUse in this report
Modelled soil typeLoam with clay influenceDesk-based site context only
Clay / sand / silt31% / 36% / 33%Not a site sample or foundation investigation
Drainage characteristicModerateDoes not confirm below-ground drainage condition
Observed surface drainageYard gullies clear at inspectionVisual observation; drains not tested

No conclusion about structural movement or drainage capacity is drawn from the modelled soil dataset. The observed rooflight/gutter defect provides direct evidence for the local internal staining.

On-site Assessments

Floor Area Measurement (RICS basis)

684.0 m² NIA · 7,363 sq ft

Calculation aid
BasisMeasured areasDeductions
Net Internal Area (NIA) — RICS Code of Measuring PracticeWarehouse 472 m² · ground-floor offices 86 m² · welfare 32 m² · first-floor offices 112 m² · gross entered 702 m²Stair, plant and circulation 18 m² · net result 684.0 m²

Dimensions entered on site; a calculation aid, not a measured survey. The EPC gross floor area uses a different basis and is not expected to equal NIA.

Crack Damage Category (BRE Digest 251)

Category 1 — Very slight

Aesthetic
Crack widthPatternLocationCorroborating signs
0.5 mm · up to about 1 mmVertical, fairly uniform widthOffice stair enclosure finishNo sticking doors, frame distortion or multiple related cracks

Record and re-inspect during planned decoration. Escalate for further assessment if the crack widens, recurs quickly or develops associated displacement or distortion.

Fieldstone Building Surveys

Independent commercial building inspections

14 Example Square, Stoke-on-Trent, ST1 1AA

[email protected]

www.fieldstone-surveys.example

External Analysis

Rooflights and box gutter — north-west roof slope

Priority repair
Observation
Sealant was split at the rooflight kerb and the adjoining box-gutter lap showed coating loss, corrosion and a damp debris line.
Linked evidence
Local internal staining and elevated comparative moisture were directly below this junction after overnight rain.
Recommendation
Have a competent roofing contractor open, clean and repair the kerb and gutter joint, check adjacent laps and outlets, then water-test and photograph completion.
Follow-up
Allow the internal area to dry and confirm stable readings before ceiling finishes are renewed.

Roller-shutter bottom rail

Remove loose corrosion, assess remaining section, repair locally where viable and reinstate a compatible protective coating. Confirm smooth operation after work.

Raised yard slab edge

Make the pedestrian route safe, then lift/re-bed or locally reconstruct the affected slab while maintaining falls to the yard drainage.

External Inspection Record

Roof viewing position recorded

Rooflight and gutter location linked

Wall cladding inspected visually

Rainwater outlets viewed

Yard route inspected

Roller shutter viewed externally

Fieldstone Building Surveys

Independent commercial building inspections

14 Example Square, Stoke-on-Trent, ST1 1AA

[email protected]

www.fieldstone-surveys.example

Internal Room Findings

Warehouse — north-west bay

Below rooflight R4 / box-gutter junction

Affected
Ceiling finishStained / softened
Comparative readingElevated locally
Stored goods accessClear at defect
PriorityRepair envelope first

Observations

Local brown staining, a softened ceiling tile and elevated comparative reading aligned beneath the rooflight/gutter defect. Adjacent bays were dry on the same comparative check.

Recommendations

Complete the external repair and water test, allow drying, then replace the damaged tile and redecorate the local area. Reinvestigate if moisture persists.

Office stair enclosure

Ground-to-first-floor wall finish

Minor finish defect
Crack width0.5 mm
PatternVertical / uniform
DistortionNone observed
Tool resultBRE Category 1

Observations

Fine isolated crack in the decorated finish. Doors operated normally and no frame distortion, displacement or matching external crack was found.

Recommendations

Fill and redecorate during planned works; retain a dated record and review if it widens or associated movement appears.

Offices and welfare areas

Accessible ground and first-floor rooms

Generally serviceable

Finishes showed ordinary wear. No material water staining, distortion or unsafe floor transition was observed in the accessible rooms. Services comments remain subject to the separate visual-only limitation.

Fieldstone Building Surveys

Independent commercial building inspections

14 Example Square, Stoke-on-Trent, ST1 1AA

[email protected]

www.fieldstone-surveys.example

Essential Summary of Costs

Independent Surveyor Disclosure

Fieldstone Building Surveys and the surveyor have no financial interest in any contractor who may undertake the works. The amounts are budget allowances for client planning, not quotations, tendered prices or an assessment of lease liability. Scope and access can materially change final cost.

DescriptionStatusCost
Repair rooflight kerb and box-gutter lap; check adjacent joints and water-testStandard£2,850.00
Prepare and repair roller-shutter bottom rail; reinstate protective coatingStandard£760.00
Make safe and re-bed/reconstruct raised yard slab edgeStandard£1,200.00
Replace local ceiling tile and redecorate after confirmed dryingStandard£680.00
Review electrical installation records and advise on testing/remedial scopeSeek Further Advice

Subtotal: £5,490.00

VAT (20%): £1,098.00

Total: £6,588.00

Cost Review Notes

  • Obtain competitive quotations against a defined repair specification.
  • Confirm safe roof access, edge protection and disposal requirements with tenderers.
  • Keep electrical testing and resulting remedial work outside the allowance until a competent contractor has defined the scope.
  • Legal advisers should assess covenant liability and whether any item is superseded by the client’s intended works.

Fieldstone Building Surveys

Independent commercial building inspections

14 Example Square, Stoke-on-Trent, ST1 1AA

[email protected]

www.fieldstone-surveys.example

Important Notes

  • This report describes accessible condition on 28 July 2026; it does not guarantee concealed areas are defect-free.
  • Repair the rooflight/gutter defect before renewing internal finishes, then verify drying and water-tightness.
  • Services were not tested. Obtain and review relevant records and commission specialist advice where records are absent or concerns arise.
  • Budget allowances are not contractor quotations and exclude professional fees, access design, disruption, statutory fees and unforeseen work unless expressly stated.
  • The report supports evidence gathering. Lease interpretation, formal notices, quantified demands and negotiations remain matters for appropriately appointed professional and legal advisers.

Declaration

I confirm that this report records the observations, limitations, interpretations and recommendations stated. I have reviewed the relationship between the roof defect and internal evidence, separated visible condition from legal liability, and identified where specialist advice is required.

The report has been checked for internal consistency. Costs are budget allowances for planning and are not contractor quotations or an assessment of lease liability.

Survey prepared and signed by

Maya Bennett

Maya Bennett MRICS

Signed: 30 July 2026 · Reference FBS-2026-0728

Build the report from your own inspection evidence

PropertySurvey Pro structures your scope, observations, photographs, selected modules and costs, then generates an on-device report for your professional review and sign-off.